Filed in archive
Internet TV
by martino on October 14, 2006
in related news, historians have decided that the Czar was better than Stalin
(from Business Week)
organic CEO, Mark Kingdon, said he thought YouTube would have made more sense as a Yahoo property.
Google is strong as a "link and list business," Kingdon said. Yahoo, on the other hand, is expert at organizing content into channels -- and that is exactly what the fledgling YouTube site needs right now.
"I'm surprised they didn't kick it up a few notches and make the purchase."
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/39174
Addthis
Ask
Blinklist
del.icio.us
Digg
Fark
Facebook
Google
Lycos
Ma.gnolia
Mr Wong
Netscape
Netvousz
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Tailrank
Technorati
Wink
Yahoo
Vote for Web Exec: Yahoo would be better YouTube partner than Google:
|
Rating: 9.25 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Steve Stocks
(03/05/07 1:17am)
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS |  See all blog subscribe options |
 What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
I don't see any surprise in that. Yahoo admitted themselves - $1,6 billion are too much to afford. And generally I may be a little biased but I don't see any other company (other than Google) capable of turning such an investment into profit.